🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “utter hypocrisy” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

A letter obtained by media dispatched by the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the African officials requests measures restricting tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be canceled or deferred.

The company is attempting modifications of a pending law that include decreasing the proposed size of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavored smoking items, and watered-down penalties for any firms breaking the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“If I was a politician, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” said the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Thousands of residents a year die from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to global health agency statistics.

Chimbala said the letter was known to have been circulated to various ministerial offices and was in circulating through public interest organizations.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

This occurs during expanded apprehension about corporate intervention with health policies. Last month, WHO officials issued a warning that the cigarette manufacturers was escalating campaigns to weaken global control measures.

“We see evidence of corporate influence globally. Manufacturer hallmarks are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN summit conference,” said Jorge Alday.

Likely impacts

“When public health regulation fails to be approved because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in individuals' health who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The public health measure going through Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and mandating that visual health alerts cover 75% of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Via documentation, BAT suggests this be decreased to less than half “according to global guideline limits”, deferred for no less than twelve months after the bill passes.

The WHO specifically advises a warning should cover at least half of the product container front “and attempt to encompass as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings are required to occupy 65% of a packet’s front and back.

Scented product controversy

The corporation requests the elimination of comprehensive limitations on scented smoking items, arguing that it would drive users to “illegally traded” products. It suggests prohibiting a smaller list of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The pending regulation proposes sanctions for different infractions “extending from a portion of yearly revenue to ten-year jail sentences”.

Corporate defense

Via documentation, the managing director of the African subsidiary claims the corporation is focused on good corporate behaviour” and “supports the objectives of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the associated health impact” but asserts that “some regulations can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Activist reaction

The campaigner argued BAT’s proposed changes would “undermine this law so much that the impact needed for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that numerous similar measures were present in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “complete contradiction”, he said.

“We exist in a global village. If I plant tobacco in my property and harvest that and market the products – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to benefit personally and all the future family lines while my neighbor's family are dying … is in itself total emotional collapse.”

Public health laws in the United Kingdom or other countries had not caused companies to close, the advocate mentioned. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Formal company response

The company representative said: “The company operates its operations according with applicable local laws. Additionally, the company participates in the state's regulatory development in line with the appropriate structures which allow for relevant group engagement in legislation creation.”

The corporation remained “not resisting legislation”, the spokesperson stated, noting that minors should be safeguarded against acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We champion progressive regulation to achieve intended population health targets, while recognizing the range of privileges and responsibilities on businesses, users and involved parties,” the representative explained, adding that the company's suggestions “mirror the circumstances of the Zambian market and cigarette sector, which encompasses growing volumes of illegal commerce”.

The country's office of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was solicited for statement.